Understanding the root cause of recidivism and the strategies to address them

Recidivism, or the tendency of an individual to reoffend after being released from prison, is a problem that plagues the criminal justice system. Recidivism is a complex issue influenced by various factors, including the psychological, social, and economic challenges that ex-offenders face upon re-entry into society. The high rates of recidivism in the United States suggest that current methods of rehabilitation and reintegration are not effective in preventing reoffending. This blog aims to explore the root causes of recidivism and the strategies that have been developed to address them.

One of the most significant root causes of recidivism is the lack of access to resources and opportunities. Limited job prospects and financial strain make it difficult for ex-offenders to reintegrate back into society, increasing the risk of returning to criminal activity. Former prisoners’ poor psychological well-being and lack of community support services are among the factors that contribute to their inability to integrate into the community. As a result, over 50% of those released from prison are rearrested within five years, as per the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

To target this issue, intervention programs have been developed to provide ex-offenders with counseling services, education, job training, and housing assistance. Providing access to resources, such as education and job training, has been successful in reducing the rates of recidivism. In 2020, the Second Chance Act program was reauthorized, and its funding was extended to support reentry programs. By providing these resources, ex-offenders gain the necessary skills and knowledge that better equip them to transition back into the workforce, rebuild their lives and avoid re-offending again.

Another root cause of recidivism is mental health issues. Many ex-offenders suffer from untreated mental illnesses, such as depression and anxiety, which can lead to substance abuse and criminal activity. The prevalence of mental illness among inmates is significantly higher than the general population, and prisoners’ mental health needs remain a significant challenge for the criminal justice system. The treatment of mental illnesses that include rehabilitation programs shows the potential to reduce recidivism. Mental health treatment reduces the risk of relapse, which is currently a substantial issue among prisoners, and could significantly reduce the likelihood of recidivism.

To address this issue, correctional facilities can provide better access to mental health services and programs such as mental health counseling and group therapy. By identifying and addressing mental health issues, ex-offenders can receive the support to successfully reintegrate into society, and this might lead to a reduced risk of re-offending.

Lastly, parole and probation violations have been a significant contributor to recidivism rates. Probation and parole officers have significant responsibility for ensuring that ex-offenders comply with the terms of their release, including things like meeting curfews or attending appointments. When individuals fail to adhere to the conditions, they risk being re-incarcerated, thereby placing them back in the criminal justice system. To reduce recidivism rates, parole and probation officers can develop personalized plans for released prisoners, providing support, guidance and incentives that they are required to comply with. This approach will allow ex-offenders to successfully transition back into the community, reducing the likelihood of re-offending.

In conclusion, recidivism is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach to be addressed effectively. Alongside factors such as lack of access to resources and untreated mental illnesses, the criminal justice system’s challenges also lie in the processes of probation and parole supervision. Implementing evidence-based programs and adopting new policies and practices is the key to reducing recidivism rates. To reduce recidivism rates, resources, such as job training, drug rehabilitation programs, and mental health resources, have been successful in reducing the rates of recidivism. With the continued development of rehabilitation and support programs and monitoring practices, society can make significant strides in addressing the root causes of recidivism and helping ex-offenders reintegrate back into society.

References

1. Travis, J. (2013). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. National Institute of Justice Journal, 269, 40-47.
2. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.
3. Western, B., Braga, A. A., Davis, J., & Sirois, C. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1512-1547.
4. Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2011). Life on the outside: Returning home after incarceration. Urban Institute Press.
5. Petersilia, J. (2019). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
6. Latessa, E. J., Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2002). Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 66(2), 27-33.
7. Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2012). Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. Springer Science & Business Media.
8. La Vigne, N. G., Naser, R. L., & Brooks, L. E. (2010). Public opinion on sentencing and corrections policy: Results of a national survey. Urban Institute.
9. Greenberg, D. F., & Weakliem, D. L. (2012). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 29(2), 307-333.
10. McGarrell, E. F. (2010). Community justice: An emerging field. Routledge.