How Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatments Reduce Recidivism

Reducing recidivism rates in offenders can be achieved by providing mental health and substance abuse treatments. When individuals who have been previously incarcerated for criminal offenses reoffend and return to the criminal justice system, they are referred to as recidivists. Several factors can contribute to this recurrence, such as social, economic, and psychological factors, including mental health and substance abuse disorders.

Studies have shown that untreated mental health and substance abuse disorders are a significant contributor to recidivism rates. According to reports from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, nearly half of state prison inmates and over half of federal prison inmates have previously been diagnosed with mental health disorders. However, the limited access to mental health treatment within prisons has left many offenders without the care they need, increasing the risk of recidivism.

Managing mental health disorders is essential in reducing the likelihood of recidivism. Through counseling, therapy, and medication management, treatment programs can effectively treat mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can go untreated in prison, making it challenging for offenders to integrate effectively into society.

One study published in the Journal of Criminal Justice found that treatment for mental health disorders could reduce the risk of reoffending by as much as 31%. Treatment can help offenders manage many other problems, such as substance abuse and interpersonal relationships, which are crucial factors in reducing recidivism rates.

Substance abuse is another factor that contributes to recidivism rates. Reports from the National Institute on Drug Abuse indicate that close to two-thirds of inmates in state prisons display signs of substance abuse or addiction. A vast majority of individuals with substance abuse disorders are likely to commit criminal offenses to acquire drugs or engage in illegal activities when under the influence.

Substance abuse treatment programs have proven to be effective in mitigating the chances of recidivism. Treatment plans such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, 12-step programs, and medication-assisted therapies can help individuals manage their substance abuse disorders, lowering their risk of reoffending.

Research shows that individuals who undergo substance abuse treatment programs are at a lower risk of reoffending. According to the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, individuals who complete substance abuse treatment have a 46% lower risk of reoffending than those who do not. Furthermore, treatment can improve offenders’ holistic health, reduce drug-related crimes, and help them integrate into society better.

Integrated treatment plans that address both mental health and substance abuse disorders have proven to be more effective in reducing recidivism rates. Since a majority of individuals with mental health problems usually struggle with substance abuse, treating both disorders simultaneously is the best approach. Integrated treatment programs provide a comprehensive approach to managing both mental health and substance abuse disorders.

A study published in the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment found that integrated treatment programs were more effective in reducing recidivism rates than traditional treatment plans. Participants of integrated treatment programs had a 30% reduction in reoffending after six months compared to those who participated in traditional treatment programs.

In conclusion, mental health and substance abuse disorders are significant contributors to recidivism rates in offenders. Providing targeted treatment programs for mental health and substance abuse disorders can improve offenders’ holistic health, reduce drug-related crimes, and help them reintegrate into society. Integrating both treatment programs is the most effective approach to managing recidivism rates among offenders. By addressing these problems, we can promote healthy, productive communities.

1. James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental Health Problems of Prison and Jail Inmates. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
2. Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S. M., & Peterson, J. K. (2011). Correctional Policy for Offenders with Mental Illness: Creating a New Paradigm for Recidivism Reduction. Law and Human Behavior, 35(2), 110–126.
3. Treatment for Drug-Abusing Offenders in the Criminal Justice System. (2012). National Institute on Drug Abuse.
4. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., & Butzin, C. A. (2004). Five-Year Outcomes of Therapeutic Community Treatment of Drug-Involved Offenders After Release from Prison. Crime & Delinquency, 50(1), 88–107.
5. Coviello, D. M., Cornish, J. W., Lynch, K. G., Boney, T. Y., & Maher, K. J. (2017). A Cluster Randomized Trial of Comprehensive Opioid-Related Substance Abuse Intervention in Community Correctional Officers. Addiction, 112(9), 1572–1581.
6. Hunter, B. A., & Jason, L. A. (2013). An Investigation of Integrated Substance Abuse Treatment and Transitional Housing. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 9(1), 29–34.
7. Lattimore, P. K., Cao, Y., & Visher, C. A. (2010). How Effective is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? The Results of a Comprehensive Evaluation. Journal of Correctional Education, 61(4), 339–365.
8. Haque, M., & Day, A. (2014). Combined Offender Rehabilitation Effectiveness: A Systematic Review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 550–563.
9. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Meta-Analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369–404.